Free article 3 of 5 today  •  Go unlimited from $3.25/mo

As Malina was taken to the Pope-Hennessy police station on Sunday, her dog remained on the sidewalk, held by a police officer. Mr. Sanjeev Teeluckdharry then came forward to take the animal in his arms. The scene, filmed during the police intervention, circulated on social networks and sparked numerous reactions.

For several Internet users, this gesture went well beyond a simple reflex. In a context marked by emotion and agitation, the lawyer chose to take care of an animal visibly disoriented by the sudden separation from its mistress.

Many Internet users have welcomed this mark of compassion. Some saw it as a reminder that, even in the midst of police intervention, it is possible to show humanity towards the most vulnerable.

However, this gesture is not an isolated event. It is part of a long-standing commitment by Me Sanjeev Teeluckdharry in favor of animal protection.

Before devoting himself fully to his career as a lawyer, he was also a deputy for constituency no. 5 (Pamplemousses–Triolet) and a member of the government under the Lepep Alliance. During his mandate, he was involved in several issues related to animal welfare.

His name remains notably associated with one of the most important legal battles in favor of the animal cause in Mauritius. In 2015, videos showing alleged acts of mistreatment of dogs within the Mauritius Society for Animal Welfare (MSAW) caused great emotion in the country. The images, filmed notably at Forest Side State Secondary School, also attracted the attention of international media.

Following this affair, the Saving Our Strays (SOS) association contacted Mr. Sanjeev Teeluckdharry, who agreed to intervene on a voluntary basis (pro bono).

With his wife, Me Namrata Teeluckdharry, as well as several other jurists, he had put together a case supported by testimonies, affidavits, photographs and videos in order to challenge the denounced methods of capturing and euthanizing stray dogs.

This legal action led to a first victory before the Supreme Court. An injunction had ordered that the dog and her puppies, at the heart of the Forest Side affair, be handed over to the Saving Our Strays association. The fight then continued in court so that the practices denounced could be examined in light of the Animal Welfare Act.

At the time, Mr. Sanjeev Teeluckdharry maintained that euthanasia provided for by law must be carried out without unnecessary suffering and under veterinary supervision, believing that no legal provision could justify acts of cruelty towards animals.

It is in this continuity that many today interpret his gesture towards Malina's dog. For those who follow his journey, it is not a simple spontaneous reaction, but a philosophy that he has defended for years.

Enjoying Mauritius News in English?

You've used 3 of your 5 free articles today. Subscribe for unlimited access plus a daily newsletter.