Mauritius' Global Business Companies (GBC) sector is based on a staggering US$741 billion in assets, a pool of capital approximately 50 times greater than the domestic GDP of the entire country. However, this astronomical wealth exists largely on paper. The offshore sector contributes only 8.4% to local GDP (financial services as a whole accounts for around 13-14% – a fraction of what its asset base might suggest), a gap so stark that the International Monetary Fund had to recommend that the country impute a value estimated at GBC production simply so that it appears in national export statistics. By construction, money only passes through the island; he never really lands there.
The monetary anomaly
This decoupling has made Mauritius an atypical and risky case among global financial centers. Most offshore centers eliminate foreign exchange risk entirely in order to preserve economic stability. The British Virgin Islands use the US dollar directly; Belize, the Cayman Islands, Hong Kong and the United Arab Emirates firmly peg their currencies to the greenback (precisely via a currency board in the case of Hong Kong). Even Singapore, the only major financial center with a floating exchange rate, closely manages this floating with the specific aim of maintaining a strong and stable exchange rate.
Mauritius, conversely, lets the rupee float freely. Despite an offshore volume equivalent to 50 times its economy, the rupee has persistently depreciated – losing around 64% of its value against the US dollar since 1994.
When the US Federal Reserve and other global central banks aggressively raised interest rates, the Bank of Mauritius delayed corresponding rate hikes for years. This shift in monetary policy triggered internal capital flight, with local investors transferring their rupee assets to more profitable foreign accounts.
Today, foreign exchange earnings would be hoarded in foreign currency accounts rather than converted into rupees. The local currency thus finds itself supported by tourism, remittances and foreign direct investments – and not by the imposing offshore volume which nevertheless relies on it.
Wall Street versus Main Street: a structural divide
This discrepancy highlights a fundamental structural difference between Mauritius and the major traditional financial centers. If the divide between “Wall Street” and “Main Street” reflects an unequal distribution of wealth within the United States, Wall Street nevertheless retains a direct and deep interest in the American game. She operates at
Enjoying Mauritius News in English?
You've used 2 of your 5 free articles today. Subscribe for unlimited access plus a daily newsletter.